Success chances in argument games: a probabilistic approach to legal disputes
نویسندگان
چکیده
The outcome of a legal dispute, namely, the decision of its adjudicator, is uncertain, and both parties develop their strategies on the basis of their appreciation of the probability that the adjudicator will accept their arguments or the arguments of their adversary. Costs and gains have to be balanced in light of this uncertainty in order to identify the most convenient strategies. This paper provides a probabilistic approach embedded into an argumentation framework to capture this uncertainty and its use to determine the expected utility to engage in a legal dispute.
منابع مشابه
EUI Working Papers LAW 2007/29 Success Chances in Argument Games: A Probabilistic Approach to Legal Disputes
The outcome of a legal dispute, namely, the decision of its adjudicator, is uncertain, and both parties develop their strategies on the basis of their appreciation of the probability that the adjudicator will accept their arguments or the arguments of their adversary. Costs and gains have to be balanced in light of this uncertainty in order to identify the most convenient strategies. This paper...
متن کاملبررسی تاثیر عاملهای اقتصادی و اجتماعی بر موفقیت ورزشی کشورها در بازیهای المپیک (2012-1996)
Sporting success in international competitions is influenced by various factors. Exercise can identify the success factors in the development of sports programs for the development of human resources with a view to effective economic and social factors. This study investigates the impact of socioeconomic factors on the countries sports success at the Olympic Games.In this regard ,Using performa...
متن کاملTwo party immediate response disputes: Properties and efficiency
Two Party Immediate Response Disputes (TPI-disputes) are one class of dialogue or argument game in which the protagonists take turns producing counter arguments to the ‘most recent’ argument advanced by their opponent. Argument games have been found useful as a means of modelling dialectical discourse and in providing semantic bases for proof theoretic aspects of reasoning. In this article we c...
متن کاملProbabilistic Games
Assume we have the following game. A verifier V interacts with two provers P1 and P2. The verifier is probabilistic and acts honestly according to its (known) strategy. The goal of the provers is to convince the verifier of a certain fact. The provers may collaborate to set up a strategy to maximize their chances of success. However, they are not allowed to exchange information once they receiv...
متن کاملLaw 2010/13 Department of Law a Dynamic View of Litigation. Agent-based Simulation Insights on Medical Liability Cases
All substantive areas of law with no exception have a common concern for the processes by which legal disputes get resolved. Naturally, the success of any particular litigation strategy in a legal dispute depends on a number of factors. Examples of influential factors are procedural costs, the judge’s accuracy and, most importantly, the litigation strategy followed by the counterpart in dispute...
متن کامل